The father of the pilot at the centre of the Air India crash has broken his silence, vowing to defend his son’s reputation as questions mount over British aviation safety protocols. In an emotional statement, retired airline captain Rajesh Singh insisted his son, Captain Arjun Singh, was not at fault. “My son was a meticulous professional.
He would never have taken risks,” he said, hinting at a cover-up. Sources close to the investigation confirm that the flight data recorder has revealed anomalies in cockpit communications moments before the crash. But the UK’s Air Accidents Investigation Branch (AAIB) has remained tight-lipped, citing “ongoing inquiries”.
This is a pattern we have seen before. When the system fails, it finds a scapegoat. Captain Singh’s father is not buying the official narrative.
Neither should we. The aviation industry is a closed shop. Regulators and airlines have a cosy relationship that often puts profit before safety.
Documents uncovered by this journalist show that the airline had previously flagged concerns about runway lighting at the UK airport, but no action was taken. Now, three investigators have quietly recused themselves from the case. Why?
The family is demanding answers. They have hired a former MI5 officer to look into the pilot’s background, fearing a smear campaign. Meanwhile, the British government is facing calls for a public inquiry.
The Transport Select Committee has announced an emergency hearing. But will it be enough? This is not just about one crash.
It is about a system that allows dangerous shortcuts. The pilot’s father knows that if his son is blamed, the real culprits will walk free. We will be watching closely.
The truth is buried under layers of bureaucracy and plausible deniability. But somewhere, someone is about to break.
